Levi's sports white knots in support of gay marriage
Filed under: Entrepreneurship, Extracurriculars, Charity, Relationships
Now that Memorial day has passed, Levi's has begun outfitting its mannequins in white. This year, however, the bright color doesn't just represent the beginning of the summer or a nice accent for denim. Rather, the jean giant has also begun using white to demonstrate its support for gay marriage.
The White Knot program encourages people to demonstrate their solidarity with marriage equality by wearing a small piece of knotted white ribbon. A subtle symbol, white knots have appeared on the clothing of celebrities ranging from New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg to comedienne Kathy Griffin. And now, of course, they are appearing on hundreds of Levi's mannequins.
This is an interesting move for the company. While Levi's once represented the pinnacle of jean fashion, it has long since been replaced by an endless procession of other brands.
Current favorites, including Rock & Republic, Diesel, 7 For All Mankind, and True Religion are priced far out of the range of most Levi's. Moreover, the company's decision to launch its "Signature" line, which is primarily marketed through Wal-Mart and other discount retailers, could be regarded as an admission that the company is permanently positioning itself as a mass-market brand.
Although the more cynical among us might argue that Levi Strauss' move to support gay marriage is part of a plot to gain more gay customers, this seems reductive. After all, in recent years, the company has aggressively moved to gain a significant portion of the gay market.
On television, they have released ads directly targeted at gay consumers and sponsored programs on Logo. More substantively, it was the first Fortune 500 company to offer health benefits to "domestic partners of unmarried employees." Late last year, Levi's gave $25,000 to the coalition leading the fight against California' Prop 8, and its chairman emeritus gave $100,000.
Earlier this month, as part of the company's "501 Day," Levi Strauss let employees take off the day from work to volunteer with nonprofit organizations in their communities. Levi's then gave cash grants to the organizations that their employees endorsed.
In San Francisco, where the company is headquartered, these organizations included the San Francisco LGBT Center, Out of the Closet, and the AIDS Memorial Grove. Later in May, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) honored Levi Strauss for its inclusion of gays in advertising and its attempts to foster LGBT-friendly workplaces.
Part of the reason that Levi Strauss is able to make this commitment to supporting LGBT rights is because it is still family-owned. However, in a broader context, the company's moves demonstrate that LGBT rights might not be quite as controversial as the past eight years may have suggested.
After all, while one might expect gay marriage to gain traction in Massachusetts and California, Iowa's decision to make it legal demonstrates that inclusive policies are not the sole purview of coastal America.
In fact, given the passage of Proposition 8 in California and New York's slowness in pushing for marriage equality, it seems that America's most avowedly liberal states may have much to learn about inclusion!
While it seems likely that Levi's might lose a little bit of market share in some of the country's more conservative areas, its move to embrace gay rights suggests that this issue has become more about civil rights than about religion. In this context, it seems like the move for universal marriage rights may have turned a corner.
The White Knot program encourages people to demonstrate their solidarity with marriage equality by wearing a small piece of knotted white ribbon. A subtle symbol, white knots have appeared on the clothing of celebrities ranging from New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg to comedienne Kathy Griffin. And now, of course, they are appearing on hundreds of Levi's mannequins.
This is an interesting move for the company. While Levi's once represented the pinnacle of jean fashion, it has long since been replaced by an endless procession of other brands.
Current favorites, including Rock & Republic, Diesel, 7 For All Mankind, and True Religion are priced far out of the range of most Levi's. Moreover, the company's decision to launch its "Signature" line, which is primarily marketed through Wal-Mart and other discount retailers, could be regarded as an admission that the company is permanently positioning itself as a mass-market brand.
Although the more cynical among us might argue that Levi Strauss' move to support gay marriage is part of a plot to gain more gay customers, this seems reductive. After all, in recent years, the company has aggressively moved to gain a significant portion of the gay market.
On television, they have released ads directly targeted at gay consumers and sponsored programs on Logo. More substantively, it was the first Fortune 500 company to offer health benefits to "domestic partners of unmarried employees." Late last year, Levi's gave $25,000 to the coalition leading the fight against California' Prop 8, and its chairman emeritus gave $100,000.
Earlier this month, as part of the company's "501 Day," Levi Strauss let employees take off the day from work to volunteer with nonprofit organizations in their communities. Levi's then gave cash grants to the organizations that their employees endorsed.
Part of the reason that Levi Strauss is able to make this commitment to supporting LGBT rights is because it is still family-owned. However, in a broader context, the company's moves demonstrate that LGBT rights might not be quite as controversial as the past eight years may have suggested.
After all, while one might expect gay marriage to gain traction in Massachusetts and California, Iowa's decision to make it legal demonstrates that inclusive policies are not the sole purview of coastal America.
In fact, given the passage of Proposition 8 in California and New York's slowness in pushing for marriage equality, it seems that America's most avowedly liberal states may have much to learn about inclusion!
While it seems likely that Levi's might lose a little bit of market share in some of the country's more conservative areas, its move to embrace gay rights suggests that this issue has become more about civil rights than about religion. In this context, it seems like the move for universal marriage rights may have turned a corner.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 38)
5-27-2009 @ 2:30PM
James said...
Screw u Levi I'll buy Wranglers
Reply
5-27-2009 @ 4:10PM
George said...
you show them.....duh. you probably wear things designed by gays duh....
5-27-2009 @ 3:49PM
Ginger said...
Douche.
5-27-2009 @ 3:48PM
K9Roadie said...
I heard that....Urban Pipeline at Kohls for the new look and wranglers if if you want the classic...See ya Levis
5-27-2009 @ 4:03PM
Annika said...
i hate closed minded people... let them be happy.. gay marriage doesn't hurt ANYONE
6-15-2009 @ 4:56PM
Simzee said...
I second this motion. Let all the married gays buy Levi's
5-27-2009 @ 4:23PM
Simzee said...
I'll also buy Wranglers. Let all the GAY MARRIED people buy Levi's.
5-27-2009 @ 5:48PM
John said...
Go right ahead, "Wrangler butts drive me nuts". By the way Wrangler has put out some gay ads of their own. You want something not tied to the Gay community, than you better learn how to sew. But sewing is just sooo gay too.
5-27-2009 @ 5:54PM
harmony said...
I think it's hysterical that people won't buy a brand of pants because the brand supports gay rights. It's hysterical that you think anything you wear now has nothing to do with gay people. Most designers are gay men, and if not them, their employees are. To boycott a brand because they're vocal about their beliefs in human decency is laughable.
And for those of you commenting on the "right and wrong" of homosexuality, maybe you should read your Bible a little closer, maybe have another look-see at the passages where God tells us to love our neighbors as we would ourselves. Maybe you should be a little less righteous, and a little more right. God loves us all, even those of you who soil His name for your own personal agenda of denying others their rights as human beings.
5-27-2009 @ 6:30PM
John said...
Are you crazy? Have you seen how good a guy’s ass looks in Levis? Now yes this is coming from a gay man, but women also love the way a man’s ass looks in Levis. Let’s all buy Levis if not for equality but also for cute butts!
5-27-2009 @ 7:17PM
Scott said...
Agreed ... Stick to Wrangler
5-27-2009 @ 6:54PM
Chris said...
Good Riddance.
Oh, by the way, you know Wranglers are the jeans preferred by the US Gay Rodeo Association?
Welcome to the club. . . . . . .
5-27-2009 @ 7:34PM
Jason said...
You probably wouldn't look good in Levis anyways....James....Go on with your Wranglers.....
5-27-2009 @ 10:39PM
michael said...
SCREW YOU TO DUD.
5-29-2009 @ 9:18PM
Matt said...
Harmony, you are so off-base on God, the Bible and righteousness. Know this, that God's Word in unwaivering. Loving your neighbor does not mean to love their sin.
5-28-2009 @ 11:39AM
JOJO said...
Same here, Wanglers are now my favorite, well has been for years. They last longer !!!!!!!!! As real men do
5-28-2009 @ 12:29PM
Sean said...
You're an ass James !
5-28-2009 @ 12:58PM
Rob said...
Well said. We're with you....and we live in Californi-cate.
5-28-2009 @ 1:41PM
possumbob@aol.com said...
Yeah, your chaw and NASCAR program should fit better in those anyway.
5-28-2009 @ 5:32PM
FlaGal said...
Matt... you are so correct. The Bible teaches us to love the person but not what sin the person is doing. He never intended for same sex marriage, let alone same sex couples. Humans are to reproduce while in a commitment of marriage as Christ has commited himself to us. Also, why do you think he destroyed Sodom and Gamora... It wasn't because they were God fearing people, but ones who were "Tolerant" of imorality of all types, including homosexuality.